Comments on: John Kerry – Affair Allegations Exploding http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/ Just another WordPress.com weblog Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:51:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: cyetain http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/#comment-230 Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:37:20 +0000 http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/#comment-230 So how accurate did that story end up being?

]]> By: Rob Kischuk http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/#comment-229 Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:11:06 +0000 http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/#comment-229 Certainly he walks a line further out than a lot of other news sources out there – mostly because he breaks the headline, while other sources wait until they have the whole story. In this case, he confirmed Wesley Clark’s comment through multiple eye-witnesses, and the news itself was already being investigated by several publications – they just didn’t have enough to publish it.

If, however, you wish to discredit Drudge’s credibility, I ask this of you – find for me a story he has broken that was inaccurate. http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/ is yours for the researching. I’m not calling him a good reporter, that’s not his role. I’m saying the stories he breaks tend to be factually accurate.

]]> By: cyetain http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/#comment-228 Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:57:58 +0000 http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2004/02/12/john-kerry-affair-allegations-exploding/#comment-228 If you think Drudge is a “fairly credible source” you need to lay off the drugs.

]]>