<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media, Reagan, and Abu Ghraib</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/06/10/media-reagan-and-abu-ghraib/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/06/10/media-reagan-and-abu-ghraib/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kischuk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/06/10/media-reagan-and-abu-ghraib/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kischuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2004/06/10/media-reagan-and-abu-ghraib/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Like I said, I don&#039;t know enough about what they say to suggest whether or not they need to be discarded in order to meet the necessary objectives.  Clearly, Abu Ghraib was more about stupidity than it was about obtaining intelligence.  What options does the Geneva Convention give other than asking nicely for information?  And would violations of the Geneva Convention in combat (do parts apply there?) justify less fettered interrogation to prevent further violations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, I don&#8217;t know enough about what they say to suggest whether or not they need to be discarded in order to meet the necessary objectives.  Clearly, Abu Ghraib was more about stupidity than it was about obtaining intelligence.  What options does the Geneva Convention give other than asking nicely for information?  And would violations of the Geneva Convention in combat (do parts apply there?) justify less fettered interrogation to prevent further violations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Watson</title>
		<link>http://blog.kischuk.com/2004/06/10/media-reagan-and-abu-ghraib/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2004/06/10/media-reagan-and-abu-ghraib/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Of course, the problem with tossing out the Geneva Conventions is that the US will have no right to complain the next time their own soldiers are tortured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the problem with tossing out the Geneva Conventions is that the US will have no right to complain the next time their own soldiers are tortured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
