<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye SideKick II, hello Blackberry 8700</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kischuk.com/2006/01/11/goodbye-sidekick-ii-hello-blackberry-8700/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kischuk.com/2006/01/11/goodbye-sidekick-ii-hello-blackberry-8700/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kischuk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kischuk.com/2006/01/11/goodbye-sidekick-ii-hello-blackberry-8700/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Kischuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2006/01/11/goodbye-sidekick-ii-hello-blackberry-8700/#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see myself going back, but Danger&#039;s going to have to work to earn my business back.  They have indeed done an EXCELLENT job on the interface and usability, but they&#039;ve neglected the hardware for too long.  8 megs of internal storage doesn&#039;t cut it anymore.  The walled garden approach of only letting users install software that T-Mobile blesses and charges you for is unreasonable.

They&#039;ll need to significantly improve and revise the hardware.  The rumors that one of the next SKs will be a music-centric device doesn&#039;t appeal to me at all.

If I don&#039;t return the Blackberry after the trial period, I&#039;ll have a 2 year contract to fulfill and think about what my next phone will look like.  I&#039;ll probably head back to T-Mobile and get a free phone from them when that time comes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see myself going back, but Danger&#8217;s going to have to work to earn my business back.  They have indeed done an EXCELLENT job on the interface and usability, but they&#8217;ve neglected the hardware for too long.  8 megs of internal storage doesn&#8217;t cut it anymore.  The walled garden approach of only letting users install software that T-Mobile blesses and charges you for is unreasonable.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ll need to significantly improve and revise the hardware.  The rumors that one of the next SKs will be a music-centric device doesn&#8217;t appeal to me at all.</p>
<p>If I don&#8217;t return the Blackberry after the trial period, I&#8217;ll have a 2 year contract to fulfill and think about what my next phone will look like.  I&#8217;ll probably head back to T-Mobile and get a free phone from them when that time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.kischuk.com/2006/01/11/goodbye-sidekick-ii-hello-blackberry-8700/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rkischuk.wordpress.com/2006/01/11/goodbye-sidekick-ii-hello-blackberry-8700/#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ll probably go back :)  .  For me, the Sidekick II is simple and does what I want it to without crashing or just plain getting screwed up.  The HTML browsing actually really works too better than any other phone I&#039;ve tried including Treo and Blackberry.  In fact I paid big bucks for a Treo and returned it because it just sucked usability wise compared with the sidekick.  I&#039;ve got enough stuff to hack on at work and at home.  I could really care less about ring tones.  In fact, I don&#039;t even want to have to think about my phone except for when I plug it in.  I am quite happy with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll probably go back <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   .  For me, the Sidekick II is simple and does what I want it to without crashing or just plain getting screwed up.  The HTML browsing actually really works too better than any other phone I&#8217;ve tried including Treo and Blackberry.  In fact I paid big bucks for a Treo and returned it because it just sucked usability wise compared with the sidekick.  I&#8217;ve got enough stuff to hack on at work and at home.  I could really care less about ring tones.  In fact, I don&#8217;t even want to have to think about my phone except for when I plug it in.  I am quite happy with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

