I haven’t often directly mentioned the name of my employer, Proficient Systems, wanting to give my blog a bit of separation from the company. The news came through this last week, the announcement that Proficient is being purchased by LivePerson, our chief competitor in the enterprise market for proactive chat on web sites.
It’s a mixed bag of news, and I have a ton of different feelings wrapped up in it, particularly since this is one of the few jobs over the years that I’ve actually grown to care about. We have a great team, great product plan, and great momentum in the right direction. The product plan is all but certain to survive. The rest is less certain. It’s GREAT validation of what we’ve been working on all along. It’s fantastic to see how well we’ve been able to compete on technology with a company that has a lot more resources at their disposal. It’s humbling to see how much more successful they’ve been in sales by building a base in the low end of the market and moving up from there. I have little doubt that the combined company will have a fantastic product with a great sales force behind it. The stock market gets this – their stock was up as much as 8.5% on the news. Still, the competitive part of me wanted to beat them, not merge with them. If you’re in the Atlanta area and need a few solid Java Engineers, I know some folks who are searching. And if you need a technical manager who can also contribute at a technical level, let me know that as well… I might know a guy.Feed
Recent Twitter Activity
- rkischuk: Pretty awesome touchdown photo of Georgia Tech A-back @MazerRoddy vs SCSU by @brookenovak http://is.gd/eZr9C /cc @GTBlogScott @GTAthletics
- rkischuk: Looking forward to #atlsuds at Ormsby's tonight, though I may be late and drafting a fantasy football team there. We can "draft" together.
- rkischuk: @ADaleR1 Wish you could have been there too... great day, and Massaro and Brad dropped in. Maybe you should trek up for a home game?
- rkischuk: @sanjay (obviously not a jab at you, given your role in Shotput Ventures, just seen plenty of Angels In Name Only)
- rkischuk: @sanjay Depends on how you define "angel/VC"... if you set a minimum # deals/$$ funded in the past year, I'd go with the under.
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- August 2009
- March 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- November 2003