While our product is far more than a branded social network, we realize that unlike many social networks where the company providing it is merely a conduit that doesn’t care what its users say and do, our network will be paid for by political campaigns and organizations who may want to control what goes on in their web space. The problem here is that if an organization begins to noticeably intrude on its social network, censoring posts, comments, and images beyond enforcing decency standards, its users will flee and make their voice heard on unrestricted channels.
In looking at most of the campaign web sites that I see this election cycle, I don’t see much authenticity on major campaign’s web sites. I’d love to see more large campaign blogs actually written by the candidate featuring posts that read like more than just a press release. I have little reason to believe that campaigns will expect anything less from every user of their social network – conversations with nothing but praise for the candidate and their policies, messages, and advertising. In an ideal world, branded social networks will facilitate open and honest conversations with individuals, people with independent opinions that generally support the group whose network they’ve joined, but may disagree from time to time. Clearly, we need to make it easy to identify and silence people who are only out to harm the brand. We’d also like to make it easy for supporters to make their honest opinions known, but I fear we’ll spend more time building censorship filters for some community features than it takes to build them in the first place. Organizations will be better served if they can look within their own network of supporters to understand where their agenda differs from that of their supporters. Time will tell. Of course I won’t always be able to be specific in calling out specific examples, but I’ll gladly talk about general errors in this area, praise open conversations, and look forward to building community features that will facilitate these discussions.Feed
Recent Twitter Activity
- rkischuk: Registered a greek domain. 5 characters total length. Hope it goes through. Need a simple badge design to complete the plot.
- rkischuk: @RzlClearWatr buying memberships w/ xen coming soon. Just couldn't get that in on launch day. Working hard.
- rkischuk: @dsims Looks like a typical Microsoft move. I bet they paid Netflix some nice coin to get temporary exclusivity on mobile platforms. Jerks.
- rkischuk: @taplocation Is FlexSeats dead?
- rkischuk: @jhaile I will enjoy my medieval hard drive and the extra $500-600 still in the bank. I'm sure SSDs are nice, just not for me yet.
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2010
- November 2009
- August 2009
- March 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- November 2003
0 Responses to “Limits of Branded Social Networks – Blogs”